Models – structures and instruments meant to guide behaviours and actions. Things that are most certainly, an idealist’s paradise.
But wait.
- How do you mould behaviours for a specie whose definitive traits are saturated with whims and subjective undertakings.
- Models themselves are not things of perpetual universal validity. They are and should be subject to continuous scrutiny. Even those emanating from unverified divine sources (insert a non-theist smirk 😏).
So what’s point?
- Not regarding these models as untouchable overarching behaviour enforcers.
- Reassessment of the implementation of these models from the perspective of a society whose constituents are heavily diversified.
- A continuous scrutiny of these models irrespective of their sources.
- “Modularised” implementation of these models in contrast to a mass one. And that any mass implementation should be advised by a thorough analysis of the nuances of a society’s constituents.
Case study:
When one school of thought encourages us to: be ourselves, stand out, be unique, don’t follow the crowd…
And yet another school of thought dumps on us an avalanche of rules and behaviour enforcers!
How? I mean how? 😊
Social Profiles